Cavaliers, Headlines

Cavs one of nine teams in NBA to lose money in 2016-17

AP Photo/Tony Dejak

In an excellently reported feature from ESPN’s Brian Windhorst and Zach Lowe, small market teams — including those who make the NBA Finals — are still struggling to make money in the NBA. According to reports obtained by the duo, the Cleveland Cavaliers were one of nine franchises to lose money during a 2016-17 season, one that that saw the team make their third consecutive appearance in the Finals as the league’s defending champions.

From Windhorst and Lowe:

The gap between the league’s most profitable teams and its weaker siblings will be addressed at the league’s Board of Governors meeting on Sept. 27-28 in New York. Owners have planned a half-day review of the league’s revenue-sharing system, sources said.

Some teams in smaller markets struggling to keep up with a fast-rising salary cap have pushed the league’s richest franchises to share more of their profits, according to ownership sources. Some have argued that the expanding profitability gap could warp competitive balance: If big-market teams can earn fat profits even while paying the luxury tax, they could in theory hoard more stars.

The nine teams that lost money, by the league’s accounting for net income (which includes revenue sharing and luxury tax payments), were the Atlanta Hawks, Brooklyn Nets, Cleveland Cavaliers, Detroit Pistons, Memphis Grizzlies, Milwaukee Bucks, Orlando Magic, San Antonio Spurs and Washington Wizards. League officials pointed out that by a different accounting measure the league tabulates — operating income, which discards various debt obligations — only 10 teams (rather than 14) lost money before accounting for revenue sharing.

The conflict, of course, is that teams which have been among the league’s worst for several years — namely the New York Knicks and Los Angeles Lakers — have been able to derive some of the league’s best numbers despite running their franchises into the ground while some of the league’s best teams —The Cavs, Memphis Grizzlies, Milwaukee Bucks, Washington Wizards, and San Antonio Spurs — struggle. The Lakers, specifically, are cited raking in $115 million profit despite writing a revenue-sharing check for almost $49 million while failing to win more than 27 games in any of the last four seasons. The reason for this: Local revenue versus that on the national scale.

The salary cap is a function of nationally generated revenue (i.e. the recently inked $2.7 billion TV deal) while teams are forced to pay these increasing salaries with locally earned dollars. If these aren’t rising in lockstep (Spoiler alert: They’re not) teams then are forced to deficit spend, especially those who are over the luxury tax threshold. If you’re wondering how the Cavaliers can struggle to earn despite playing in the April, May and June months that do not include the overhead of salaries, here’s all you need to know:

Combined revenue from all 30 teams determines the salary cap, and the biggest teams make the most money — and therefore drag the cap up for everyone else. Consider the Warriors, who have become a business juggernaut. (They had $92 million in net income last season despite playing in the oldest arena in the league and sending $42 million out in revenue sharing.)

Every Golden State home playoff game generates revenue — about $15 million a pop in the NBA Finals last season, sources say — that nudges the cap up a notch for the rest of the league. The Warriors don’t get to keep all that money, as playoff revenues are shared with the league, but the documents show they netted $44.3 million from just nine playoff games last season, more than twice as much as the second-place Cavs, who netted $20 million.

The Knicks made $148 million from their local television deal last season. The Lakers were, of course, right behind them with $104 million. According to Sports Business Daily, the Cavaliers earned a fraction of this at roughly $37 million. The big drag, of course, is that luxury tax payments do not adjust for market size. The Cavs reportedly made $21.7 million in net income before revenue sharing, but quickly drifted into the negative after paying $24.8 million in luxury taxes and $15.2 million in a revenue sharing.

It’s important to disclose that these figures are purely related to income generated by the game of basketball, stripping out additional revenue generated by ownership in ancillary businesses. It’s also important to note that this is the best way to level the playing field when comparing teams within the league as every owner has interest in businesses outside of their respective franchises. This report does not infer that Dan Gilbert, owner of the Cavaliers, lost money last year; it’s that he didn’t make any, from an accounting standpoint, through the Cavaliers.

  • BenRM

    I wonder if luxury tax should be more of a floating target that continually adjusts for market size, etc. I hadn’t thought of it before, but it’s silly that the Knicks and Lakers would incur the same “penalty” as the Bucks or Grizzlies (or Cavs).

  • mgbode

    Great stuff Scott. Always interesting to take a peek at how leagues are attempting to solve the financial gaps to give hope to all teams (and generate enough money for the owners of the smaller teams to have incentive to be there).

    I’m a bit surprised the local TV deals for the big markets are that low. MLB has twice the inventory, but also it appears twice the income from it (figured there would be more economies of scale for the cable businesses there).

    For instance, the Dodgers make around $332m/year in local TV monies. The Angels (2nd LA team) makes $150m/yr. The Yankees and Red Sox have shady accounting practices w/ their local TV networks they own, but it was said at the time of the Dodgers deal that it was modeled after the money they were making.

    The Indians make $40m/yr, which aligns almost directly to the Cavs $37m/yr despite that inventory.

  • Chris

    Not exactly on topic, but at least it’s revenue related…

    Spoke with a Tribe ticket member for a bit yesterday while picking seats for next year. Unsurprisingly, they got bombarded with 40 and 20 game packages leading up to the deadline for postseason priority (hell of a time for a 22 game win streak). He said the weekend options for 20-game packs are already about gone and it’s forcing people into the weekday packages. That helps to puts a healthy “floor” on mid-week attendance.

  • mgbode

    Encouraging.

  • CBiscuit

    Stoopid Gilbertz! Saint Griffin would’ve turned a prophet!

  • Chris

    Except that he didn’t
    😉

  • Steve

    “it’s that he didn’t make any, from an accounting standpoint, through the Cavaliers.”

    The only important line in the piece.

  • CBiscuit

    Blasfeemy! How dare you beasmerch the most holy?! He made monies hands over fists and won and didn’t have to borow like this milleneal GM they got now. Kids…

  • JanetMBraud

    Google is paying 97$ per hour,with weekly payouts.You can also avail this.
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $11752 this last four weeks..with-out any doubt it’s the most-comfortable job I have ever done .. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    !dw247:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleNetJobsCorpWorkFromHome/find/jobs ★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫:::::!dw247..,…