Cleveland professional sport team ownership: While We’re Waiting

Cleveland Indians Paul Dolan

Cleveland sports have had an interesting week. It took the continued dumb managerial move from Terry Francona of letting starting pitcher Josh Tomlin see the opposing lineup a third time to halt the Cleveland Indians winning streak. During the previous six-game streak, the Tribe dominated in all three phases of baseball (pitching, hitting, defense). It was revealed on Tuesday that Cleveland Browns wide receiver Corey Coleman might have been more involved in a New Year Eve assault than we thought as his brother and friend were formally charged. And, the Cleveland Cavaliers both celebrated their one-year championship anniversary and sent the Cleveland sporting fandom into a tizzy on June 19.

The Cavs craziness, of course, was due to the firing (he had a week left on his contract, so I’m going with firing) of current general manager David Griffin. In one fell swoop, the Cavs went from the defending champion team about to make the NBA competitive balance landscape even more laughable by trading for Jimmy Butler or Paul George to being in for certain doom of LeBron James leaving with Kevin Love and Kyrie Irving soon to follow. The truth is somewhere in the middle, but owner Dan Gilbert added undue drama during what happens to be one of the most crucial and busiest portions of the NBA offseason. Should we really be surprised though?

Gilbert does a bunch of good in his life. He has spent more than $2 billion on revitalizing downtown Detroit. He has bought up as many old, decrepit buildings as he could and turned them into attractive living and commercial spaces. Even if one accounts for possible long-term profit being a motivator, the act helps a community who needed such an upfront investment. RocketFiber is also a Gilbert investment that has helped Detroit gain the high-speed internet it needed for many of the corporate investments to even be a consideration.

However, the reports from the days after The Letter was penned in Comic Sans were that of a head-strong, crass individual who refused to allow anyone but himself get their own way. Other incidents have backed up that portrait. He got into a fist fight with a friend at a bar mitzvah.1 He fired a supposed confidant Jeff Cohen, and pushed Nathan Forbes away from influence in basketball operations despite both men continuing to hold minority stakes in the team.2

ESPN’s Brian Windhorst doesn’t paint a much better picture of Gilbert when discussing what Griffin needed to endure from him in order to do his normal functioning job over the years.

Sometimes Gilbert would insert himself into trade talks, calling another owner directly, and derailing Griffin’s plans. Sometimes he’d send scathing emails on subjects within and outside Griffin’s control. And other times he was nowhere to be found, unreachable or distant at key moments.

Gilbert’s issues are also not solely within the structure of the Cavs organization as WFNY commenter nj0 was quick to point out on Tuesday.

DOJ and HUD charge that Quicken Loans encouraged it employs to avoid compliance on FHA-insured loans. The trial is set to begin in April of 2019. By that time, we might be in the midst of a second burst housing bubble, as Quicken Loans is currently the largest participant in the FHA program.

Which makes me realize that Larry Dolan is the only Cleveland sports owner not involved in a federal investigation.

A pretty good article from the New York Times on Mr. Gilbert and Quicken.

A team owner being under federal investigation is nothing new for a fan of a Cleveland sport team. The Browns owner, Jimmy Haslam, has had his Pilot/Flying J franchise under FBI investigation for years. The allegations are that they were bilking truckers and companies out of millions of dollars and many of the claims have been settled with several high ranking officials pleading. Thus far, nothing has been able to connect Haslam himself.

Having an owner being given the blessings by the Rooney family to steer the ship of a division rival should have always been suspect. Even minor things such as uniform alterations and scoreboard changes3 have been handled with the care of a Rottweiler selecting meats from a butcher shop.

Constant turnover on the front office and coaching staff have quickly labeled Haslam as an overbearing owner with an itchy trigger finger. Even as he admits his mistake for firing the Rob Chudzinski coaching staff after a single year; it does not undo the damage of removing all possibility of competing, then firing the staff for not doing so. Haslam has even been steward of the franchise that saw him once again hire Ray Horton Jr. as defensive coordinator only to fire him after a single year.4

Much of the veteran removal and purging payroll is on the front offices under Haslam’s direction. However, poor stability also contributed to Mitchell Schwartz, Alex Mack, T.J. Ward, and others leaving the team in free agency. Not to mention not having a foundation strong enough to deal with problem players such as Josh Gordon, Johnny Manziel, and Justin Gilbert. Oh, did we mention Manziel? Yes, Haslam famously told his staff to “go up and get our guy” on draft day, and he was happy to note that advice from a homeless man and a desperate text from a free-falling Manziel were factors in his decision to do so.

There are good aspects to Haslam though. Haslam is taking a less visible role in directing the football operations, and there have been no reports indicating he is micro-managing behind the scenes. His wife, Dee Haslam, has been integrated into the business and philanthropic side of the team, and she has offered a level set of trust of the front office anytime she is asked.

The front office itself that Haslam put in place is a radical approach, which a team in the decrepit state of the Browns needs in order to challenge the old world order of the Baltimore Ravens and Pittsburgh Steelers in the division. Football analytics have taken hold. While a frustrating part of the process was a complete deconstruction of the roster with more rookies and second-year players receiving snaps than any other team in the NFL, Haslam has continued to show his support for those efforts and acknowledged it was an accepted part of the plan (though everyone noted they had hoped to win more than one game- at least on the record).

One of the legitimate questions for Haslam going forward will be if he will be willing to spend. Despite being in the big, bad NFL with tons of revenue sharing and a hard cap, the Browns have been able to avoid spending money on players in the Haslam era. He has spent a ton on coaches and front offices members as firing regimes after a year or two puts a lot of dead money on the books, but the player roster has not seen the checkbook open until this past offseason. The Browns have had the most or second-most cap space remaining in each of the past four seasons. The money spent on active players has been pitiful: $81 million in 2016, $104 million in 2015, and $109 million in 2014. The hope is that roster teardown was part of the process and the acquisitions of Brock Osweiler (while gaining a second-round pick), Jamie Collins, Kevin Zeitler, J.C. Tretter, and Kenny Britt have helped boost the Top 51 contracts for 2017 to $145 million.5

Cleveland fans are used to charges of being a cheapskate leveled at owners too. The Dolans have long been destroyed over their inability or reluctance to boost the payroll of the Indians. For years the Tribe was near the bottom of the MLB ranks in money paid out to players (though never so low as the Tampa Bay Rays, Houston Astros, or Miami Marlins when they made a mockery of the process by having a lower payroll than they even received in league revenue sharing checks). The common refrain from the front office and ownership was that the team would spend when they had a contending club. Sadly, from 2008 through 2012 there was not a club anywhere near contention to be had.

Recent seasons have seen a change as the Dolans have lived up to their word: $93 million in 2014, $92 million in 2015, $138 million in 2016, and a projected $130 million for 2017. The Tribe has seen their record stay above .500 during this span and won the American League after adding payroll at the trade deadline for a player who might have been the single biggest reason they got to the World Series, Andrew Miller. The Tribe is still nowhere near the New York Yankees or Los Angeles Dodgers in terms of money spent, but the imbalance of revenue in MLB means they are spending a higher percentage of their money back into the team. Even better, the recent facelifts to Progressive Field utilized no public funding (in a time when the Texas Rangers and Atlanta Braves are building new ballparks of the same age).

The Indians also added a minority investor over the offseason. The arrangement seems a tad different in dynamics compared to how Gilbert treats those with stakes in the Cavs as Paul Dolan told cleveland.com’s Terry Pluto:

For several years, Dolan was looking for a minority investor. “It had to be the right person,” said Dolan.
That person became John Sherman, who joined the Indians on August 19, 2016. Dolan declined to say how much of the team is owned by Sherman, other than it’s “a minority share.”
Did he have an impact? “We now have more resources and that gave us a willingness to risk just a tad more,” he said.
Dolan said Sherman was “absolutely all for” the signings of free agents Boone Logan ($6.5 million) and Encarnacion. “I made John my partner,” said Dolan. “We talk a lot.”

Paul Dolan has been the leader who has emerged as the face and leader of the ownership group. He is not seen often, but Dolan has been quite friendly and amicable in the few interviews when he is seen. He supported the Party At Napoli’s and he shaved his head in team solidarity for Adriana Aviles. He talked about the emotional meaning of the Indians winning the American League.

For his father, Larry Dolan. He is now 86. It was Larry Dolan who brought the family into the baseball business in 1999 and put his son in charge.
“The last time we got a trophy like that together, he was my little league coach,” said Dolan. “It was a special moment.”

Dolan also explained to Pluto why he was confident in the organizational structure of the front office even through the lean years. Why he understood that they had the necessary talent and drive there to make the dynamic changes that altered the landscape of the Indians development system that has led to the current extended contention window.

“Yes, there is a temptation when you’re losing to think, ‘I gotta do something,'” said Dolan. “But over the years, other teams were raiding our front office for people. The reputation that Mark and Chris had in baseball was well known to me.
“I knew we had (financial) challenges, but I also felt we had the right plan and right people. We couldn’t abandon it.”

Dolan also was the 2016 Mayo Society Person of the Year for his work in and around the community. He is not perfect by any means though. There are some who disagree with his rebuffs of MLB commissioner Rob Manfred’s attempts to move away from Chief Wahoo as the team logo. Oh, and his younger son, Peter, is going to be a senior at the University of Michigan this fall.

Yes, there is much more stretching to be done in order to find negatives about Dolan than either Gilbert or Haslam. At least one of our professional sport franchises is under the stewardship of someone who does not make one cringe and has set up the organization as one that is being copied across their sport.

  1. Gilbert attorneys allege he was defending himself. []
  2. Hat-tip to Scott Sargent []
  3. a Tennessean making a scoreboard look like that state? cmon now []
  4. Gregg Williams is by all marks a better man for the job, but the stain of the past lives on. []
  5. Numbers courtesy of spotrac.com. []

  • Garry_Owen

    Except, I don’t have a total lack of concern. I’ve never said that and I’ve never insinuated that. That’s your projection, but it’s not accurate. What I have is a total lack of acceptance of blatant and baseless, and specifically motivated, partisan accusations (particularly when the leaders of those partisan factions have explicitly said that they have seen absolutely no evidence of collusion or anything else).

  • nj0

    Fair enough. When I say “larger war”, I meant one directly with Russia and/or Iran.

    Honestly, I always viewed Obama’s Middle East strategy as coldly pragmatic, a nasty bit of realpolitik completely at odds with what most would expect from a Nobel Peace Prize winner.

  • chrisdottcomm

    I’ll take plausible.

  • CBiscuit

    Ha. I’m going to start saying that it’s not that I have a “total lack of concern” but instead just a “lack of acceptance of baseless.” Come on, that’s a little funny no?

    Ok, We’ll leave it at that. We solved everything today! Plus, we’ll be standing shoulder to shoulder marching in search of the truth on this one. Ok, sincerely enough politics for me before we offend each other. Get back to work now!

  • nj0

    I’d also add:
    What’s John McCain on?
    Where can I get some?

  • Garry_Owen

    Gotcha. Agree.

    I’m not too worried about things escalating with Russia (because the President is their patsy!! ). In all seriousness, my inexpert assessment is that Russia is embracing this as a means to re-install the old Cold War, which was beneficial to those currently in charge of that regime, and they don’t want a shooting war with us anymore than we want one with them. I certainly hope I’m right, but I absolutely recognize that we are one dumb decision by some fairly low-level soldier, sailor, or airman (God, please keep the Marines away!) away from something really, really bad. Which, again, is a great reason to stay clear of all of this crap to begin with, Mr. Bush, Mr. (and Mrs.) Clinton, Mr. Bush, Mr. Obama, Mr. Trump, et al.

  • CBiscuit

    Well, we should hopefully not have to trust any party’s word. There are special investigators looking into the issues. What kind of men? Top. Men.

  • BenRM
  • BenRM

    It’s been a global trend. (Brexit, the rise and success of nationalist parties all over Europe etc.), It’s likely attributable to a lot of very reasonable stuff that has lead to a lot of very unreasonable results.

  • Garry_Owen

    Well, when someone launches the “partisan” missile, it deserves some form of “baseless” missile defense. Silly rhetoric deserves silly rhetoric. I mean, we’re all lawyers here. We know what these words mean and don’t mean.

    And for the record, counselor, I have too much respect for you to be offended by you. I’ll happily stand shoulder to shoulder with you anywhere, but please understand that I’m pretty skilled at finding cover when the bullets start flying.

  • nj0

    Which gives me a reason to bring up the time James Blunt (the guy who did that annoying “you’re beautiful” song that was overplayed throughout the aughts) might have prevented WW3 while serving during the Kosovo War…


  • nj0

    If the guy in charge of the FBI during 9/11 can’t save us, nobody can.

  • Garry_Owen

    Not sure how much of that story I believe, but it is a BEAUTIFUL tale. Regardless, it’s stunning and frightening how many times we have been “this close” to World War 3 since 1945.

    My biggest fear as an officer was an action – honest or dishonest – by a “strategic corporal,” a phrase that was drilled into our heads to emphasize the narrow margins under which the present world operates, noting that a corporal could make a decision that impacts entire nations. (At the time for us, it was that group of contemptible idiots at Abu Ghraib.)

  • mgbode

    the primary system in our country is such a joke – as is the 2-party system


  • CBiscuit

    Ok fair enough. But for the record for whatever it’s worth (and I’m 100% about it), wasn’t directing that last “partisianship” label at you. In re-reading, I could totally see how it appears–and that’s my fault for not being specific since I was weaving back & forth from you to the general–but it was meant as a general point, FWIW. I wouldn’t label you or anyone in these threads…we simply don’t know enough and that’s not fair in general to broad brush. Specific issues—let’s fire away at each other! That is all.

  • Garry_Owen

    The primary system is just a function of the party system. It has nothing whatsoever to do with the essential and integral democratic process. Which is what makes it such a joke. We are bound by something that has absolutely no basis in the Constitution or principles that formed our republic.

  • nj0

    The British general, Mike Jackson, tells the same story in his autobiography (though I don’t think he mentions Blunt). It’s also mentioned in a BBC documentary called “Moral Combat: NATO at War” (again, no Blunt). Maybe it wasn’t quite so dramatic, but who knows.

  • mgbode

    It’s even worse than that states. It creates home inflation. Prices have skyrocketed upwards for no other reason than the rates are low. One of the many measures the previous regime was willing to throw as “a fix” which is a short-term mirage that hurts who they say they are attempting to help long-term (those first-time home buyers are hurt most by cost going up artificially). Then, the next regime doesn’t want to touch it because the short-term will look like it is hurting that market (all while potentially putting ourselves in store for another housing bubble burst).

    It is actually a bi-partisan issue that does a nice job describing how our country is hurt by the current mindset of “winning” over “governing” — everything is done for the short-term to win the next election rather than w/ a long-term vision that can make a better impact.

  • nj0

    I’m actually starting to think that liberal democracy is on its last days and will be replaced by something new and other.

  • Garry_Owen
  • mgbode

    Mueller won’t have his report until Christmas, I would assume. Those things take much more time than a summer no matter what the conclusions end.

    Regardless, the #Resist everything started before Mueller. As did the block and obstruct legislation & SC nominees when Obama was in office as did the vilification of Bush before that as did the impeachment of Clinton before him as did…

    Both parties have us right where they want us.

  • jpftribe

    Welcome to 1972.

  • nj0

    so much depends

    a strategic

    glazed with rain

    beside the white

  • jpftribe
  • CBiscuit

    Wow. I really don’t know enough about the results of 9/11 investigation…was it his fault? Did he bury facts or later obstruct justice or something?

    Or are you saying he’s corrupt and not trustworthy?

    Or that he’s not qualified to lead an investigation into the Russian issues because there was a terrorist attack when he was in charge of the FBI?

    Or are you just making a 9/11 joke that’s not that specific?

  • Garry_Owen

    We really need to get your sarcasm scanner replaced and the ol’ snark software upgraded, buddy. You’re worrying me.


  • mgbode

    I promise to be a benevolent dictator.

  • Garry_Owen

    And I promise to gently depose you.

  • mgbode

    Since you are a lawyer, I assume you mean you will give written testimony to me. I shall accept it, read it, and then recycle it. I do not guarantee any action taken from it.

  • Garry_Owen

    Yeah, yeah. That’s TOTALLY what I meant. No need to have your guard up. At all.

  • mgbode

    Before this back-n-forth, you were up for a position on the security counsel. Oh well.

  • Garry_Owen

    Are you entirely sure that you don’t want to keep me close by? Really think about this.

  • Garry_Owen

    Here’s how I know it’s fake: Stonewall Jackson was an American, not a Britisher.

    They thought they could fool us.

  • mgbode
  • nj0

    Just pointing out how being in charge during the biggest national security failure ever won’t hurt your future employment prospects in Washington. To be fair, Mueller had only been in-charge of the Bureau for like a week before that, so that’s really not on him. Where he really loses points is in the investigation afterwards, where he lied about (or was ignorant of) how much information the Bureau had collected that indicated a 9/11 style attack. He did a lot to cover-up the FBI’s failure. (Which isn’t even to get into condoning the torture of the Bush years.)

    In short, I don’t trust him. FBI directors have always put the good of the Bureau first, sometimes even over that of the US government and its citizens. Mueller investigating a politician I dislike doesn’t change any of that.

  • nj0

    Little known fact: Jackson received the nickname Stonewall for his excellent play at left tackle for the Bowling Green Falcons.

  • CBiscuit

    That’s interesting…thanks for the follow up. I didn’t know much about him other than he was a Vietnam vet and intelligence long timer who was head of FBI under Bush. I’d heard that he was a “good guy”…a label both parties gave him and give other intelligence & justice dept folks like Comey and Rosenstein when they want to say…hey, he’s actually an American who cares and a good public servant. Or something like that. But who knows really at the end of the day. You hope they are and that they do the right thing. I always have a deep hope that our judges and intelligence servants keep up the good fight–and that they glue everything together and operate with honor, even in times like this. Sometimes that hope gets more desperate in dark times, but it’s there.

  • Garry_Owen

    Which is a significantly better nickname than the one that Ambrose “Turnstile” Burnside earned whilst playing right tackle for the Cleveland Browns.

  • CBiscuit

    Ugh….I don’t even know anymore! I’m just trying not to step on landmines…and I’m trying to shut down the internet for today but it keeps pulling me back.

  • Garry_Owen

    Understood. Maybe step away from the MSNBC and the social media feed for a while? Sit out a couple of rounds? I just got back from a week at the beach, and I’m feeling fine. Mellow. Chill. Granted, the tight braids and beads are a little irritating, and I’m starting to get a headache, but other than that, my worry level is low and my perspective is refreshed and renewed.

  • CBiscuit

    MSNBC?! why you little….ok fine. The visual of G_O as Bo Derek is hilarious enough to chill me the eff out. Hope you had fun…stress is a lawyer killer my friend. Stay sane. And hey, I’m going to Legoland w my two boys Thurs-Sat, so that’s ummm…sort of a vacation-ish? It’s no work at least!

  • nj0

    I share your optimism at times, but then I think of COINTELPRO and the FBI blackmailing Martin Luther King Jr.

  • Garry_Owen

    That’s totally escape, if not vacation. And the thought of me as Bo Derek is also doing weird things to me. And I’m not sure I mind . . .

  • Kathleenwgreenwald

    aliciarmclean Google.Com is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !pa173d:
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GooogleFinancialJobsCash173FinderDesignGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!pa173l..,….

  • Nidiabgaitan

    my classmate’s half-sister makes $72 every hour on the internet. She has been without a job for eight months but last month her payment was $16159 just working on the internet for a few hours.Here’s the site to read more……++++++++++++++++++++

  • Barbracthomas

    my classmate’s half-sister makes $72 every hour on the internet. She has been without a job for eight months but last month her payment was $16159 just working on the internet for a few hours.Here’s the site to read more……++++++++++++++++++++