The Browns are so bad that ESPN listed Pittsburgh twice in the standings

Obviously the headline is a bit of a joke, but the mistake is real. The ESPN standings page does not even list your Cleveland Browns when I looked a few minutes ago. That, combined with the Cleveland Browns’ performance in the first two weeks of the NFL season leads to a great many punchlines. I’ll start. I thought the world was bad enough with one Pittsburgh Steelers, let alone two. (RIM SHOT!)

Browns Standings Smaller


[Related: Browns lose, commit crimes against entertainment]

  • MrCleaveland

    Hey, look on the bright side. We had another fantastic learning experience.

    Man, we waited nine months for this garbage?

  • The_Real_Shamrock

    Jimmy Haslam must really be confused by this but look at the bright side after tonight the Browns will have company in the basement.

  • mgbode

    add up those standings and Pitt has 2 losses. so, they’ll join us in the bottom. I’m told that misery loves company

  • Lunch

    Well that’s interesting. One more reason to use NFL.com, or some other website, instead of ESPN.com.

  • Root4Cleveland

    Pat Shurmer says he still is seeing a lot of improvement….lots of progress. That’s what its all about, right?