Buckeye Senior Class a Winning Group
December 2, 2010Cavaliers Preview Game #18: Heat at Cavs
December 2, 2010I think it’s pretty easy to forget how truly great Grady Sizemore was before he got hurt. For one, it feels like it’s been so long since he’s been healthy: for nearly all of the 2009 and 2010 seasons, Grady was either on the DL or should have been. It’s pretty clear that his health cost him major parts of the last two seasons. On top of that, he had a really nice year in 2008, but the team imploded around him as Hafner fell off a cliff and CC was traded away. So in some ways, we haven’t really seen Grady since 2007.
But even more than that, a good deal of Sizemore’s greatness always flew under the radar anyway. His value was so evenly distributed among his defense, his bat, and his baserunning that people often overlooked how much he was contributing.
Take a look at this chart that measures Sizemore’s Wins Above Replacement according to Fangraphs.com (fWAR):
Year |
fWAR |
AL Rank |
2005 |
5.4 |
6th |
2006 |
7.3 |
1st |
2007 |
5.7 |
8th |
2008 |
7.1 |
1st |
TOTAL |
25.5 |
2nd |
From 2005 to 2008, only one AL position player amassed more wins above replacement for his team than Grady—Alex Rodriguez. Considering that Rodriguez was paid about $85 million more than Grady over this period, it’s arguable that Grady was the single most valuable position-player in the American League in the years leading up to his injury. I think that sometimes gets overlooked, even by those of us in Cleveland.
But now the question is not whether he was great, but whether he can ever approach those levels of production again. Microfracture surgery is a pretty tricky business: the surgeon drills numerous holes into the tibia and femur to encourage new cartilage growth. And while the procedure has a long history in the NBA, it is relatively new to Major League baseball.
So in digging around a bit, I found an article discussing microfracture’s effect on baseball players–especially from a fantasy perspective. Here’s a snippet:
“First off, running will be a big issue (especially with microfracture to the Tibia or Femoral condyles) due to the surfaces being loaded and sheared. A player known for speed will likely see a dip in his stolen base totals if he is still having some discomfort upon return. If the player is not experiencing pain, and had a good surgical result, he should resume his base stealing ways.
The biggest issue will be hitting – period. The knees are obviously quite important in loading weight properly and transferring power during the swing. The lower leg undergoes torsion in relation to the thigh (Femur) – creating a sense of “grinding” in a cartilage-deficient knee.
Following microfracture, it is not uncommon for a player to feel hesitant to “let it rip” at the plate. Gradual batting drills and tee work leads up to soft toss and eventually batting practice in the cage, prior to any game-situation rehab assignments.”
That sounds…not so good. Especially the part about hitting: Grady’s stance is wide, and because he’s fairly slight of build, a good deal of his power would seem to derive from transferring his weight forward, causing the sort of “torsion” mentioned above.
Unfortunately, since microfracture is relatively new in MLB, there just aren’t a lot of great comparisons out there to be made. Grady doesn’t have a lot of comps as it is, and none of them have undergone microfracture surgery at his age. But there are three MLB players who’ve undergone the surgery that I could find, and I thought we’d look at their offensive performance both before and after the surgery, to see what kind of drop-off they experienced.
A few groundrules: (1) I’m using OPS+ to measure offensive production; it’s not a perfect tool, but for our purposes, it will work just fine. You’ll remember that OPS+ is adjusted for position, ballpark, and year, and that 100 is exactly average. (2) “Pre-Surgery” is defined as the last three healthy seasons prior to surgery. So if you had your surgery in 2007, “Pre-Surgery” will be defined as 2004-2006. (3) Post-surgery is only the first year back. Here goes:
Player (surg. Date) |
OPS+ Pre-surgery |
OPS+ post-surgery |
Change |
Brian Giles (2007) |
126 |
137 |
8.7% |
Chad Tracy (2007) |
106 |
82 |
-22.6% |
Sandy Alomar (1999) |
89 |
83 |
-6.7% |
AVERAGE |
107 |
101 |
-5.9% |
As you can see, Brian Giles actually improved coming off of surgery, posting a 137 OPS+ in 2008 compared to a 126 in the years leading up to the procedure. The other two guys? Not so much. Both Chad Tracy and Sandy Alomar (a multiple microfracture patient, actually) saw their numbers drop after the procedure.
Obviously, we just don’t have enough players to conclude anything rational—three is hardly a sufficient sample size. On the other hand, who ever accused me of being rational? These three guys are really the only indication we have on how Grady’s offensive prowess will be affected, so I suppose it’s better than nothing.
Here are Grady’s numbers from 2006-2008 (I’m leaving out 2009 and 2010 because I believe he was injured both years. (If you’d prefer to look at 2007-2009, well, the internet is free—have at it.):
YEAR |
OPS+ |
2006 |
133 |
2007 |
123 |
2008 |
133 |
Composite |
130 |
So let’s call an OPS+ of 130 Grady’s “base” offensive season. That means that, barring injury, he’s basically 30% better than the average AL centerfielder; for the record, his 130 OPS+ translated to an .879 unadjusted OPS over the same three year period.
Now let’s start chipping away at that value a little. What if we take the three players as a guide, and assume that microfracture will cost Grady about a similar degree of his offensive value. Let’s look at all three as an example, and then the composite value:
Player (surg. Date) |
Change |
Effect on Grady’s OPS+ |
Brian Giles (2007) |
8.7% |
141 |
Chad Tracy (2007) |
-22.6% |
101 |
Sandy Alomar (1999) |
-6.7% |
121 |
AVERAGE |
-5.9% |
122 |
So it would appear that if things go as badly for Grady as possible, and he recovers as poorly as Chad Tracy did in 2008, that he’d still be slightly above average offensively (for a CFer). If on the other hand, he actually gets better like Brian Giles did, he’ll experience one of the all-time great seasons for centerfielder.
Neither of those is particularly likely, of course. With so few examples to build off, we’d be wise to, as the statisticians say, regress to the mean, which basically means to weight Sizemore’s previous production more highly than the effects that microfracture surgery may or may not have had on three other random dudes. Basically, find the “real” Grady Sizemore, and assume that what’s more likely than anything is that he’ll come back.
The problem, of course, is twofold. First, who is the real Grady Sizemore? Was 2009 a product of injury or decline? Until we can answer that, all projections are mere guesswork. Here I assume that he was injured, but I have no reason to believe that other than hope for the future and his nagging hernia issue. Second, will he be healthy next season? Manny Acta suggested earlier this week that Grady will be his centerfielder “until I hear anything different.” That’s reassuring. I guess.
So long as Acta doesn’t hear anything different in the next few months, we might just get our best player back and producing at MVP levels (Choo’s best season by fWAR is far below Sizemore’s best, if you’re wondering). This time, let’s make sure to take notice.
11 Comments
Nothing to do with Grady, but a great article on Cleveland and the Queen.
Unfortunately I think that was a pretty futile exercise. As you said, you have to regress to the mean. We would likely have to make some attempt to neutralize the BABIP as well, as all three guys have about a 20 point swing in pre-surgery BABIP and post. Even the fact that all three guys fell off to replacement player or out of the game pretty quickly after the surgery is tough to interpret at as well. Giles was 37 year old outfielder, Alomar was a 34 year old catcher, these aren’t age-position combinations we should have high expecations for. Tracy was the only one to have this surgery in his prime, and it completely sapped his power, his key tool.
For what it’s worth, I had microfracture surgery (and torn meniscus)on my knee in 2007 (Age 26). Although I don’t play professional baseball, I was very active on the softball circuit. I definitely lost a few steps on the basepaths, not because of straight ahead speed, but the planting and rounding of each base. My initial lateral reaction to flyballs in the outfield was off a few split seconds and I also was hesitant to really turn on ball at the plate because of the torque needed in the lower body. I hope Grady has better results than I have experienced with a similar injury. Best of luck to him as he’s my favorite player and obviously the Tribe really needs him.
as long as Acta is willing to put Sizemore in LF, then I think it’s fine that we give him a shot to regain what he once was (I don’t think he gets to even 90% of it though)
but, if Acta continues this “he is our CF” nonsense, then I want him traded out now while he still has some value and isn’t killing our defense and setting himself up for another injury(because I really don’t think he’ll be able to handle CF this year)
When healthy, Grady was an exciting player to watch and a dangerous member of the lineup. When I think of Grady now though I lump him with Carlos Baerga. They are both players who exploded on the scene but then through injury or hard living flamed out. Even if Grady returns to his 2005 numbers he’s still surrounded by a bad team and his contract is due to expire soon. Best case scenario, Grady returns healthy and productive and the Tribe can trade him for some good prospects.
2012 is his club option year of his contract ($8.5M).
If he is effective they know he won’t stay at below market rates and will trade him. If he’s ineffective, or just kind of effective, they certainly won’t exercise his option and will try to dump him as soon as they can to reduce payroll.
Hard for me to be terribly interested in the recovery of a guy who’s gone very soon, either way.
@Harv – well, if you care about the Indians (I will assume that you do since you clicked here and posted), then Sizemore recovering to pre-injury status would net us a much bigger return than if he doesn’t.
that alone should be reason enough to care even if you think there is no chance we resign him.
Sorry for the mass response, but here goes:
@ Charles: Agreed. I think (like I hopefully say at the end of the piece) the actual question is twofold: (1) who’s the real Grady; and (2) is he healthy? The comps were largely for fun, but not meant to be instructive.
(Though I should say, I disagree with your point about BABiP. Pitcher BABiP is largely the product of luck. But batter BABiP? That’s where the good hitters outshine the crummy ones. Look at the league leaders in BABiP: they’re always the best guys. It’s a fairly predictable skill. So I don’t think we can say that there mightn’t be a correlation between players undergoing microfracture and a dip in BABiP. After all, they’d likely hit the ball with less authority. Sounds like something that would be worth looking into if only the sample size were more reasonable.)
@ JO: Jeez. That doesn’t bode well for us, does it? Good info though. Thanks!
@mgbode: I disagree with you on both points I think: I want to give Grady his shot in CF again AND I don’t think his trade value could possibly get lower than it is right now (although moving him to left would lower it, I guess), considering the weird option clause in his contract.
@ Reggie: Hard-living? Like too many coffee cups? I guess I don’t know what you mean by that line, or the comparison to Baerga. Everything I’ve read suggests that Grady is gym rat and keeps himself in great shape. If you’re saying that this injury is the end of his career, well, I guess we’ll just have to wait and see, but I sure hope not.
If the ‘great Grady’ returns, but the Tribe sucks, Sizemore will be gone before the deadline. Probably for a couple of ‘A’ ball pitchers (one of which must have a bad wing – the other …high upside.
Jon,
I think you wrote a good story. Even though we’re division rivals, I’d like to see Grady back because he’s a great player and competitor.
Jon – but it’s not like these guys maintained a high or low level of BABIP before and after the surgery. It bounced around, significantly enough that we should question how lucky/unlucky a player was before and after the surgery. And not all dipped. Giles and Alomar both saw large increases. We fail sabermetrics (and statistics) 101 when we say ‘most of the time luck doesn’t affect batter BABIP, so I’m going to assume that’s always the case”